Design 101: Spacing as a clue
First, people glance at a printed page. They catch an impression in the blink of an eye. If it is alluring, they look at it again, now paying more attention and studying what they see more slowly. If, in turn, this second "take" promises something worthwhile, they decide to do the real work – reading the captions, if there are any, or the text, if that's all there is. This is not a series of consciously controlled reactions but a set of natural responses to human curiosity. To attract and hold readers, we must manipulate those responses. But we must also take into account two vital factors:
That is why the first glance, which reveals the "WIIIFMSWSIB value" (What Is In It For Me So Why Should I Bother?), is absolutely crucial. Everything we put on the page must be welcoming, direct, and immediately comprehensible. This need for simplicity and immediate accessibility affects both the editing as well as the design process. Certain elements must be highlighted so they attract the potential reader irresistibly. Editing picks out the element; designing shows them off. Do not waste your efforts on fun-and-games for their own sake - startling images that say nothing but "look at me" aren't "clever" (or "different" or "creative"). Avoid puns in titles or pictures and resist inserting puzzles the reader will have to figure out. Concentrate instead on the relevance of your message to your target audience. The greatest service we can give our potential readers is to present them with clear information, so all the thinking-work is already done for them. Use
space to organize
Pages – whether printed or online – are usually made up of a variety of elements (title, deck, text, subheads, pictures, captions, charts, pull-quotes, etc.). Often pages encompass several sets of such elements, in the form of separate "stories." How the relationships of those
elements are explained (presented) to the viewer makes the page appear
welcoming...or repulsive. The blander the mosaic, the more regular the
spacing between things, the more unhelpful (and, therefore, the more difficult)
the message is perceived to be. On the other hand, the more varied the
spaces-between are, the more obvious the individual clusters of information
become. The viewer understands instinctively what belongs to what (which
is always helpful); plus, the big mass is broken down into digestible
component parts. Short, quick in-and-out segments are always read first
as they demand the least effort. Size is also a major factor, but for
more detail you should read our guide on design sizing.
You don't need much space around an object to give importance. You just need a bit more than there is around all the others. The whole trick is in controlling the relationships, so you can contrast narrow versus wide. Functional use of space helps
you to clarify the structure of the page and emphasize those elements
that are worthy of notice at the same time. Both are vital clues for the
first-glancer. |
||
![]() |
||
Equal spacing, wide Here is the same group of units with equal (but wider) spaces between them. Has the added space made any difference to the understandability of the image? Absolutely not – other than making a looser conglomeration and forcing the units to be smaller. The block-as-a-whole is still the dominant element. |
||
![]() |
||
Unequal spacing The magic of varied spacing is that, without thinking or analyzing it, you just know immediately that there are three rows of units and that you are to read them from left to right. Why? Because narrow spaces glue things together, while wider spaces separate. Obvious? Of course, but that's just what's useful about it. |
||
![]() |
||
Random spacing The spaces-between need not be strictly geometric and parallel. The effects of similar spacing or different spacing are just as discernible in irregular relationships as in regular ones, though the regular ones are easier to control. In this example, there is no question that the group has been broken into four columns. |
||
![]() |
||
Crowding in space The individual objects are not particularly valuable here. They can't be – look how many of them there are. No matter what the objects, their very number and agglomeration makes them common and unimportant. Remember: crowding devalues. |
||
![]() |
||
Isolation in space The object is displayed in lonely splendor in a large empty area. It is The object here is displayed in lonely splendor in a large empty area. It is perceived as important because all competition has been pushed aside, beyond the confines of the frame that encloses the space. The object is perceived as valuable because of the investment in all that surrounding empty space. |
||
![]() |
||
Written by Jan v. White |
||
Share this article
|
|











Share this article